The Earthquake That Will Rock the Pacific Northwest

It’s Science Week at The Weather Channel, and we’re celebrating in a big way! Starting every morning with AMHQ we are giving you an in-depth look at the science behind weather. We love science and we invite you to celebrate with us. We Love Weather will be focusing on one branch of science each day this week and giving you an inside look at amazing stories. This article is dedicated to Earth Science!

“An earthquake will destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest. The question is when.”

If that sentence doesn’t make you shake in your boots, then you’re one in a million. Something that’s not one in a million? The huge earthquake that sentence is referring to. No, that earthquake’s probability of happening is more like one in ten in the next 50 years.

In 2015, it was brought to the world’s attention that it’s likely a ginormous earthquake will happen in the near future in the Pacific Northwest, and it’s going to be very destructive. You can read the detailed article here, but if you’d like to get the basics about how this phenomenon is going to happen, take a look at the helpful analogy below:

“Take your hands and hold them palms down, middle fingertips touching. Your right hand represents the North American tectonic plate, which bears on its back, among other things, our entire continent, from One World Trade Center to the Space Needle, in Seattle. Your left hand represents an oceanic plate called Juan de Fuca, ninety thousand square miles in size. The place where they meet is the Cascadia subduction zone. Now slide your left hand under your right one. That is what the Juan de Fuca plate is doing: slipping steadily beneath North America. When you try it, your right hand will slide up your left arm, as if you were pushing up your sleeve. That is what North America is not doing. It is stuck, wedged tight against the surface of the other plate.

Without moving your hands, curl your right knuckles up, so that they point toward the ceiling. Under pressure from Juan de Fuca, the stuck edge of North America is bulging upward and compressing eastward, at the rate of, respectively, three to four millimetres and thirty to forty millimetres a year. It can do so for quite some time, because, as continent stuff goes, it is young, made of rock that is still relatively elastic. (Rocks, like us, get stiffer as they age.) But it cannot do so indefinitely. There is a backstop—the craton, that ancient unbudgeable mass at the center of the continent—and, sooner or later, North America will rebound like a spring. If, on that occasion, only the southern part of the Cascadia subduction zone gives way—your first two fingers, say—the magnitude of the resulting quake will be somewhere between 8.0 and 8.6. That’s the big one. If the entire zone gives way at once, an event that seismologists call a full-margin rupture, the magnitude will be somewhere between 8.7 and 9.2. That’s the very big one.

Flick your right fingers outward, forcefully, so that your hand flattens back down again. When the next very big earthquake hits, the northwest edge of the continent, from California to Canada and the continental shelf to the Cascades, will drop by as much as six feet and rebound thirty to a hundred feet to the west—losing, within minutes, all the elevation and compression it has gained over centuries. Some of that shift will take place beneath the ocean, displacing a colossal quantity of seawater. (Watch what your fingertips do when you flatten your hand.) The water will surge upward into a huge hill, then promptly collapse. One side will rush west, toward Japan. The other side will rush east, in a seven-hundred-mile liquid wall that will reach the Northwest coast, on average, fifteen minutes after the earthquake begins. By the time the shaking has ceased and the tsunami has receded, the region will be unrecognizable. Kenneth Murphy, who directs FEMA’s Region X, the division responsible for Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Alaska, says, “Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast.”

You can find the scientific (and terrifying) data behind the claim about the huge earthquake in the 2015 article that made this future event famous.

What do you think of the earthquake referred to as “The Really Big One?” Tell us below!

Sources: NewYorker.com


Join the Discussion


3 Comments


  1. I dont swim. If we were not retired, on a fixed income, and medically unable to, we would be moving back to Kansas. Of course, then we’d be dodging tornadoes.

  2. If I were a young person I think I would be moving relatively soon to Texas or maybe even further East. People should believe this information, it’s based on fact and its happened before. Scientist aren’t guessing, they know it will happen its just a matter of when, and the movement their seeing tells them it is not to far in the future. Unfortunately, we all tend to think the earth is more stable then it really is.