The President, exacerbating a warming climate.

started by manowx, January 25, 2019
16 replies to this discussion
  • Member

    His economic policies have resulted in more jobs but with that comes more co2 emission.  He favors more coal burning despite unavoidable co2 and mercury emission.  He wants hundreds of more miles of ” barrier” at our southern border –  increases insolation by increasing the incidence of light rays – more warming.  His tax policy has encouraged businesses to return to the US which will intensify co2 emission.  His energy policy is one of “energy dominance” which will be detrimental to conservation, and our natural heritage.  No matter how you slice, President Trump is anti-environmental and anti-health.

  • Member

    good to know you’re anti-Trump. how about we get past the political views and just enjoy the weather?

    • Member

      President Trump talks and tweets the #SSDD (same stupidity, different day) constantly.  He thinks that global warming is a joke and not a big deal.  #DTS (dump Trump soon). 📱🙁🌎🌍🌏

  • Member

    Trump underestimates the fury of nature many critical weather events he refuses to issue a National Emergency but he does when he wants money for a wall.

    WHY?

  • Member

    President Trump does NOT understand our ever-changing weather.  Instead, he focuses on four spelling errors from his tweets.  Those are covfefe (coffee) ☕️, hamberders (hamburgers) 🍔, smocking (smoking) guns 🚬🔫, and text massages (messages) 📟📝.  #notrumpwx 💩

  • Member

    They’ve been preaching climate change for over 20 years now.  What has been done about it?  As for Co2, we breathe it out so obviously, not a problem.  I guess if you wanted to eliminate Co2, then maybe we should kill everyone.  That may not be far fetched after NY has already made baby killing legal.  But I agree with Katrina, go on Facebook if you want to argue politics.

    https://www.normalbreathing.com/CO2.php

    • Member

      But I’m apolitical!   It’s perspicuous that the Trump agenda intensifies co2 emission.  Any objective analysis would come to that conclusion

    • Member

      You didn’t read the link that I posted, did you?

    • Member

      Yours is a strawman argument.  The exhalations of humans is largely offset by crops.  It’s the use of fossil fuels that creates an imbalance.  Burning biomass in large quantities is also inadvisable.  Notwithstanding the benefits of co2 to the human body, when ozone attacks the trachea, or the trachea and the lungs, the immediate remedy is pure oxygen, NOT carbon dioxide.  Global oxygen is in slow decline because of human activities.  That is not good!  The present warming from elevated co2 is likely not a crisis.  The crisis is that there’s no arresting the trend in co2 concentration to which modern man is largely responsible

    • Member

      As I said before, they’ve been trying to stop the increase of climate change for over 20 years now, and has it helped?  No!  In fact, it’s worse than ever.

       

    • Member

      The climate has warmed about 2 F since the dawn of the industrial revolution.  one esteemed climate change skeptic Dr. P Michaels has attributed half of this warming to human gases and land-use changes.  This amount of warming is not alarming.  What’s alarming is that there’s little hope to arrest the trend in co2 concentration rise.  The implications are real for air quality as o2 levels decline.  In fact air quality is more worrisome than temperature, at least in the relative short term.

    • Member

      alright. lets get the facts straight:

      1. that number, 2F, that is fake. it was literally pulled from thin air. their is no proof that it has risen a certain amount of degrees.

      2. we are actually at one of the coolest parts of the Earth’s history. in fact, 80% of Earth’s history hasn’t been able to support ice at the poles. sure, if you look back at the 1930’s, the temperature has risen. but if you look back at the Roman Empire to now, it is quite cool.

      3. as I have said before, of course the temperature has risen since the industrial age because the population has grown by about 550%. with all these people breathing (and needing jobs) the CO2 in the air will, naturally, rise

    • Member

      Dr. Pat Michaels, a skeptic of human induced catastrophic warming was not “pulled from thin air”.  He’s a well respected scientist.  So if it’s NOT 2 F. warming, how much in your estimation have humans warmed the planet since the beginning of the industrial revolution?

    • Member

      actually, the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) released a study in late 2018. the study showed that if the temperature was rising because of CO2 emission, their is not an increase in precipitation, which is supposed to happen. you see, with doubled CO2 emission, original studies said that this would disrupt the hydrogen and water cycles, causing more precipitation to fall. this study said that over the decades past, there was/is no rise in precipitation. it also proved that their was no major intensification in the Hydrogen cycle.

      want more evidence? back on the 18 of December, a Fox Business video was released where the announcer said “‘Global Warming’ fears are a tool for political and economic change…it has nothing to do with the actual climate.” according to this video, climate change has nothing to do with the climate, rather a plan engineered by the UN. the plan originated by several groups wanting change, and decided to base it on “Climate Change”. they brought it in front of the UN and they put it into practice.

      also, want to get rid of fossil fuels? if we do that, we will end up in an even greater problem than before. we would have to go back to wood for fuel, which involves, yes, cutting down trees. and with no trees, how will we increase oxygen on a mass scale with ought having them do photosynthesis? want renewable energy (wind, solar, ect.)? that is extremely expensive to do in mass quantities, in fact Germany almost went bankrupt (or equivalent to) trying to do that. where do we get the money? that’s right, higher taxes.

      even former Nobel Prize winner Dr. Ivar Giaever says that Climate Change is fake quoting “I agree with [President] Trump, absolutely, It’s fake news.”

  • Member

    I like Trump but don’t let him distract you from the weather.

  • Member

    .

  • Member

    Weather data has only been available since the late 1800s.  How does anyone know that this “climate change” is a new phenomenon?

Reply to The President, exacerbating a warming climate.

X

Join the We Love Weather Community

You’re trying to access an exclusive feature–and trust us, you don’t want to miss it!

Sign up to We Love Weather today and enjoy these exclusive member benefits:

  • Access Exclusive Content
  • Receive Weekly Newsletters
  • Post Your Weather Photos
  • Participate in Our Forums
  • Create Your Own Profile

What are you waiting for? It only takes a minute to join!

Already a member?